Objective: To evaluate whether ethics rounds stimulated ethical reflection.
Methods: Philosopher-ethicist-led interprofessional team ethics rounds concerning dialysis patient care problems were applied at three Swedish hospitals. The philosophers were instructed to stimulate ethical reflection and promote mutual understanding between professions but not to offer solutions. Questionnaires directly before and after rounds were answered by 194 respondents. The analyses were primarily content analysis with Boyd’s framework but were also statistical in nature.
Findings: Seventy-six per cent of the respondents reported a moderate to high rating regarding new insights on ethical problem identification, but the ethics rounds did not seem to stimulate the ethical reflection that the respondents had expected (p<0.001). Dominant new insights did not seem to fit into traditional normative ethics but were instead interpreted as hermeneutic ethics. This was illustrated in the extended perspective on the patient and increased awareness of relations to other professions. Regarding insights into how to solve ethical problems, the request for further interprofessional dialogue dominated both before and after rounds.
Conclusion: The findings show the need for interprofessional reflective ethical practice but a balance between ethical reflection and problem solving is suggested if known patients are discussed. Further research is needed to explore the most effective leadership for reflective ethical practice.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Funding: This study received financial support from the Research Committee of Örebro County Council.
Competing interests: None declared.
Ethics approval: Ethical approval was obtained from the Regional Ethical Review Board in Uppsala, Sweden. The informed consent was based on written information regarding the study and voluntary participation.
↵i The term moral deliberation might also be used but seems more to be associated with decision-making.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Learning a way through ethical problems: Swedish nurses’ and doctors’ experiences from one model of ethics rounds
- Ethics rounds: affecting ethics quality at all organisational levels
- Ethics support in institutional elderly care: a review of the literature
- Important outcomes of moral case deliberation: a Euro-MCD field survey of healthcare professionals’ priorities
- Moral case deliberation
- Teaching ethics in the clinic. The theory and practice of moral case deliberation
- Training healthcare professionals as moral case deliberation facilitators: evaluation of a Dutch training programme
- A new prescription for empirical ethics research in pharmacy: a critical review of the literature
- Solo doctors and ethical isolation
- Ethical decision-making, passivity and pharmacy