Genomics provides information on genetic susceptibility to diseases and new possibilities for interventions which can fundamentally alter the design of fair health policies. The aim of this paper is to explore implications of genomics from the perspective of equal opportunity ethics. The ideal of equal opportunity requires that individuals are held responsible for some, but not all, factors that affect their health. Informational problems, however, often make it difficult to implement the ideal of equal opportunity in the context of healthcare. In this paper, examples are considered of how new genetic information may affect the way individual responsibility for choice is assigned. It is also argued that genomics may result in relocation of the responsibility cut by providing both new information and new technology. Finally, how genomics may affect healthcare policies and the market for health insurance is discussed.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Competing interests: None declared.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Genetics and public health—evolution, or revolution?
- Perceptions of genetic discrimination among people at risk for Huntington’s disease: a cross sectional survey
- Sport and exercise genomics: the FIMS 2019 consensus statement update
- Responsibility in health care: a liberal egalitarian approach
- A step forward, but still inadequate: Australian health professionals’ views on the genetics and life insurance moratorium
- The new genetics: Genetic testing and public policy
- Genetic discrimination and mental illness: a case report
- Ethical issues in predictive genetic testing: a public health perspective
- Genetic counselling in ALS: facts, uncertainties and clinical suggestions
- Measuring the impact of genetic knowledge on intentions and attitudes of the community towards expanded preconception carrier screening