Article info
Clinical ethics
The quality of bioethics debate: implications for clinical ethics committees
- Laura Williamson, School of Law, University of Glasgow, 8 The Square, Glasgow G12 8QQ, UK; L.Williamson{at}law.gla.ac.uk
Citation
The quality of bioethics debate: implications for clinical ethics committees
Publication history
- Received May 23, 2007
- Revised September 3, 2007
- Accepted September 4, 2007
- First published April 30, 2008.
Online issue publication
April 27, 2016
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
2008 BMJ Publishing Group & Institute of Medical Ethics
Other content recommended for you
- Clinical bioethics integration, sustainability, and accountability: the Hub and Spokes Strategy
- Evolution of hospital clinical ethics committees in Canada
- Evaluating a clinical ethics committee (CEC) implementation process in an oncological research hospital: protocol for a process evaluation study using normalisation process theory (EvaCEC)
- The NHS and market forces in healthcare: the need for organisational ethics
- Ethics support in clinical practice
- Ethical advice in paediatric care
- Development of clinical ethics services in the UK: a national survey
- Ethics teaching in European veterinary schools: a qualitative case study
- Consultation activities of clinical ethics committees in the United Kingdom: an empirical study and wake-up call
- Challenging misconceptions about clinical ethics support during COVID-19 and beyond: a legal update and future considerations