Objective: To assess the adequacy of the process of informed consent for surgical patients at the University Hospital of the West Indies.
Method: The study is a prospective, cross-sectional, descriptive study. 210 patients at the University Hospital of the West Indies were interviewed using a standardised investigator-administered questionnaire, developed by the authors, after obtaining witnessed, informed consent for participation in the study. Data were analysed using SPSS V.12 for Windows.
Results: Of the patients, 39.4% were male. Of the surgical procedures, 68.6% were scheduled, 7.6% urgent and 23.8% emergency, 35.2% were minor and 64.8% major. Information imparted/received was acceptable in 40% of cases, good in 24% and inadequate (unacceptable) in 36% of cases. Almost all (97.6%) patients stated that they understood why an operation was planned and 93.3% thought that they had given informed consent. Most (95.2%) thought that they had free choice and made up their own mind. A quarter (25.2%) of all patients were told that it was mandatory for them to sign the form. There was a discussion of possible side effects and complications in 56.7% of patients.
Conclusions: This study clearly indicates that surgical patients at the University Hospital of the West Indies feel that they have given informed consent. However, it also suggests that more information should be given to patients for consent to be truly informed.
- informed consent
- implied consent
- generic consent
- specific consent
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Competing interests: None.
Ethics approval: This study was approved by the University of the West Indies/University Hospital of the West Indies Ethics Committee.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Patients’ perceptions of informed consent in acute myocardial infarction research: a questionnaire based survey of the consent process in the DANAMI-2 trial
- Percutaneous coronary intervention patients’ and cardiologists’ experiences of the informed consent process in Northern England: a qualitative study
- Can informed consent to research be adapted to risk?
- Consent in the endoscopy department
- Documented consent process for implantable cardioverter-defibrillators and implications for end-of-life care in older adults
- Surgeons' opinions and practice of informed consent in Nigeria
- Guideline for obtaining valid consent for gastrointestinal endoscopy procedures
- Ensuring respect for persons in COMPASS: a cluster randomised pragmatic clinical trial
- Informed consent to HIV cure research
- Necropsy request practices in Jamaica: a study from the University Hospital of the West Indies