Objectives: To investigate the current situation of completing the informed consent for do-not-resuscitate (DNR) orders among the competent patients with terminal illness and the ethical dilemmas related to it.
Participants: This study enrolled 152 competent patients with terminal cancer, who were involved in the initial consultations for hospice care.
Analysis: Comparisons of means, analyses of variance, Student’s t test, χ2 test and multiple logistic regression models.
Results: After the consultations, 117 (77.0%) of the 152 patients provided informed consent for hospice care and DNR orders. These included 21 patients (17.9%) who signed the consent by themselves, and 96 (82.1%) whose consent sheet was signed only by family members. The reasons why patients were not involved in the discussions toward the consent (n = 82) included poor physical or psychological condition (44.9%), concerns of the consultant hospice team (37.2%), and the family’s refusal (28.2%). On a multivariate analysis, patients’ awareness of their poor prognosis (odds ratio = 4.07, 95% confidence interval = 2.05 to 8.07) and their understanding of hospice care (2.27, 1.33 to 3.89) were two independent factors (p<0.01) that influenced their participation in the discussions or their personal signature in the informed consent.
Conclusion: The family-oriented culture in Asian countries may violate the principles of the Patient Self-Determination Act and the requirements of the Hospice Care Law in Taiwan, which inevitably poses an ethical dilemma. Earlier truth-telling and continuing education of the public by hospice care workers will be helpful in solving such ethical dilemmas.
- hospice care law
- ethical dilemma
- informed consent
- terminal cancer patient
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Competing interests: None.
Ethics approval: The design of this study and patient selection was approved by the ethical committee of the National Taiwan University Hospital.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- The do-not-resuscitate order: associations with advance directives, physician specialty and documentation of discussion 15 years after the Patient Self-Determination Act
- Evaluation of end of life care in cancer patients at a teaching hospital in Japan
- Hospice delivery models and survival differences in the terminally ill: a large cohort study
- The attitudes of neonatal professionals towards end-of-life decision-making for dying infants in Taiwan
- End of life decisions: attitudes of Finnish physicians
- Physicians’ confidence in discussing do not resuscitate orders with patients and surrogates
- Increasing use of DNR orders in the elderly worldwide: whose choice is it?
- “Allow natural death” versus “do not resuscitate”: three words that can change a life
- Palliative medicine family conferences and caregiver psychological distress during prolonged mechanical ventilation
- “Do-not-resuscitate” orders in patients with cancer at a children’s hospital in Taiwan