Objectives: Bronchoalveolar lavage obtained at bronchoscopy is useful for research on pulmonary defence mechanisms. Bronchoscopy involves some discomfort and risk to subjects. We audited the process of consent, experienced adverse effects and reasons for participation among research bronchoscopy volunteers.
Design: 100 consecutive volunteer research subjects attending for bronchoscopy, repeat bronchoscopy or routine recruitment clinic were interviewed. Information was gathered about volunteer motivation, perception of the consent process and adverse effects of bronchoscopy. Suggestions for improvement were requested. Responses were themed by a second investigator prior to data analysis.
Results: 81 bronchoscopy-experienced subjects (total of 263 procedures) and 19 new volunteers were interviewed. 19 subjects (21%) reported adverse symptoms during or after bronchoscopy, but no symptoms were of sufficient severity that they would not repeat the procedure. The frequency of symptoms was not related to gender, the quality of the lavage or the HIV status of the subject. 76 subjects (94%) reported that the information given pre-procedure was useful and adequate but 43 (56%) had further questions mostly relating to their own results. The reasons given for research participation were access to health assessment (75 subjects), access to treatment when ill (61 subjects), desire to participate in research (15 subjects) and remuneration (6 subjects). 7 subjects complained that the remuneration was inadequate.
Conclusions: The main incentive to participation in research bronchoscopy was access to healthcare. Informed consent and procedure technique were adequate but subjects would value more feedback about individual and project results.
- bronchoscopy (subterms: adverse effects, complications, contraindications, education, immunology, methods)
- bronchoalveolar lavage
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Funding: We received financial support from the Wellcome Trust of Great Britain (Career Development Fellowship held by SG). This work forms part of the Malawi-Liverpool-Wellcome Trust Programme of Research in Clinical Tropical Medicine.
Competing interests: None.
Patient consent:Informed consent was the received for the publication of the details in this report.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Bronchoalveolar CD4+ T cell responses to respiratory antigens are impaired in HIV-infected adults
- Exposure to wood smoke particles produces inflammation in healthy volunteers
- British Thoracic Society guideline for diagnostic flexible bronchoscopy in adults: accredited by NICE
- Increased concentrations of human β-defensins in plasma and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid of patients with diffuse panbronchiolitis
- Complications and discomfort after research bronchoscopy in the MicroCOPD study
- Accuracy and consequences of using trial-of-antibiotics for TB diagnosis (ACT-TB study): protocol for a randomised controlled clinical trial
- Granulocyte-colony stimulating factor levels in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid from patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis
- Aspirin reduces lipopolysaccharide-induced pulmonary inflammation in human models of ARDS
- Low utilisation of bronchoscopy to assess COVID-19 respiratory infection: a multicenter experience
- Intrapulmonary protein leakage in immunocompromised children and adults with pneumonia