Article Text
Abstract
In medical practice and research it is necessary to consider the rights of the researcher or physician and of the subject or patient, to conform to scientific standards and to examine the appropriateness with respect to laws and moral values. Research ethics committees have an important role to play in ensuring the ethical standards and scientific merit of research on human subjects. Research of no scientific value is also against ethical principles. To obtain valid and reliable results from biomedical research, it is a scientific and ethical obligation to make use of the science of statistics. Therefore, for research to be evaluated using biostatistics intensively from ethical and scientific points of view, a biostatistics expert is necessary on research ethics committees. Developments in Turkey are used as examples.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
Competing interests: None.
Request Permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information:
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Limits to research risks
- Harmonisation of ethics committees ' practice in 10 European countries
- Health service research: the square peg in human subjects protection regulations
- Using human tissue: when do we need consent
- Sham neurosurgery in patients with Parkinson 's disease: is it morally acceptable
- Participation in biomedical research is an imperfect moral duty: a response to John Harris
- The ethics of sexual reorientation: what should clinicians and researchers do
- Fearing a non-existing Minotaur? The ethical challenges of research on cytoplasmic hybrid embryos
- Legislative regulation and ethical governance of medical research in different European Union countries
- Biomedical conflicts of interest: a defence of the sequestration thesis — learning from the cases of Nancy Olivieri and David Healy