The issue of genetic inheritance, and particularly the contradictory rights of donors, recipients and donor offspring as to the disclosure of donor identities, is ethically complicated. Donors, donor offspring and parents of donor offspring may appeal to individual rights for confidentiality or disclosure within legal systems based on liberal rights discourse. This paper explores the ethical issues of non-disclosure of genetic inheritance by contrasting two principle models used to articulate the problem—liberal and communitarian ethical models. It argues that whilst the latter provides a more constructive avenue to providing an ethics for donation than the competing and contradictory positions represented in a liberal rights approach, it raises issues of ethical judgement and authority that remain problematic. This ethical discussion is supported by a field study, funded by the Wellcome Trust, exploring the perceptions and experiences of recipients of donor sperm and their partners towards donor anonymity. The field study provides the empirical basis of an argument for making ethical judgements on the grounds of the community good rather than individual rights, that nevertheless recognises that both are inherently problematic.
- donor insemination
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Funding: This research was funded by the Wellcome Trust and that funding is gratefully acknowledged. The Wellcome Trust had no involvement in study design; in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; and in the decision to submit this paper for publication.
Competing interests: None.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Britain’s new preimplantation tissue typing policy: an ethical defence
- Mitochondrial donation and ‘the right to know’
- The ethical case for non-directed postmortem sperm donation
- Lowering the age limit of access to the identity of the gamete donor by donor offspring: the argument against
- Differences between sperm sharing and egg sharing are morally relevant
- Truth and the Child 10 years on: Information Exchange in Donor Assisted Conception
- The making and breaking of paternity secrets in donor insemination
- Pressure increases on UK government to remove anonymity from sperm donors
- Observational retrospective study of UK national success, risks and costs for 319,105 IVF/ICSI and 30,669 IUI treatment cycles
- Medical ethics when moving towards non-anonymous gamete donation: the views of donors and recipients