Recently, commentators close to and within the UK government have claimed that patient choice can increase equity in the context of the National Health Service. This article critically examines the basis for this claim through analysis of recent speeches and publications authored by secretaries of state for health and their policy advisers. It is concluded that this claim has not developed prospectively from an analysis of the causes of healthcare inequity, or even with a consistent normative definition of equity. The limited justification that is “framed in causal explanations” of inequity has suffered from an apparent disregard of the available evidence.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Competing interests: None declared.
All authors are writing on behalf of the International Health Advocacy Group.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Defining equity in health
- Public involvement in health care
- Does competition between hospitals improve clinical quality? A review of evidence from two eras of competition in the English NHS
- Which public health interventions are effective in reducing morbidity, mortality and health inequalities from infectious diseases amongst children in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs): protocol for an umbrella review
- More brickbats than bouquets?
- Patient choice in the NHS
- Contributory injustice in psychiatry
- Towards theoretically robust evidence on health equity: a systematic approach to contextualising equity-relevant randomised controlled trials
- Publishing information about ongoing clinical trials for patients
- Inequalities and healthcare reform in Chile: equity of what?