Article info
PDFEthics
A resource-based version of the argument that cloning is an affront to human dignity
- R McDougall, Centre for Health and Society, Level 4, 207 Bouverie St, University of Melbourne, VIC 3010, Australia; r.mcdougall{at}pgrad.unimelb.edu.au
Citation
A resource-based version of the argument that cloning is an affront to human dignity
Publication history
- Received July 26, 2006
- Revised December 7, 2006
- Accepted December 8, 2006
- First published March 28, 2008.
Online issue publication
March 28, 2008
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
2008 BMJ Publishing Group & Institute of Medical Ethics
Other content recommended for you
- Resource expenditure not resource allocation: response to McDougall on cloning and dignity
- What exactly is an exact copy? And why it matters when trying to ban human reproductive cloning in Australia
- Emotional reactions to human reproductive cloning
- Just another reproductive technology? The ethics of human reproductive cloning as an experimental medical procedure
- Reproductive cloning in humans and therapeutic cloning in primates: is the ethical debate catching up with the recent scientific advances?
- Dignity is a useless concept
- Reproductive and therapeutic cloning, germline therapy, and purchase of gametes and embryos: comments on Canadian legislation governing reproduction technologies
- Human reproductive cloning and reasons for deprivation
- Reproductive cloning combined with genetic modification
- Whose dignity? Resolving ambiguities in the scope of “human dignity” in the Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights