Article Text
Abstract
Aim: To examine how physicians’ life stances affect their attitudes to end-of-life decisions and their actual end-of-life decision-making.
Methods: Practising physicians from various specialties involved in the care of dying patients in Belgium, Denmark, The Netherlands, Sweden, Switzerland and Australia received structured questionnaires on end-of-life care, which included questions about their life stance. Response rates ranged from 53% in Australia to 68% in Denmark. General attitudes, intended behaviour with respect to two hypothetical patients, and actual behaviour were compared between all large life-stance groups in each country.
Results: Only small differences in life stance were found in all countries in general attitudes and intended and actual behaviour with regard to various end-of-life decisions. However, with regard to the administration of drugs explicitly intended to hasten the patient’s death (PAD), physicians with specific religious affiliations had significantly less accepting attitudes, and less willingness to perform it, than non-religious physicians. They had also actually performed PAD less often. However, in most countries, both Catholics (up to 15.7% in The Netherlands) and Protestants (up to 20.4% in The Netherlands) reported ever having made such a decision.
Discussion: The results suggest that religious teachings influence to some extent end-of-life decision-making, but are certainly not blankly accepted by physicians, especially when dealing with real patients and circumstances. Physicians seem to embrace religious belief in a non-imperative way, allowing adaptation to particular situations.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
Funding: This study was supported by a grant from the Fifth Framework Program of the European Commission, Brussels, Belgium (contract qlrt-1999-30859). The Australian part of the study was supported by a grant from the National Health & Medical Research Council of the Australian government.
Competing interests: None.
Other content recommended for you
- Labelling of end-of-life decisions by physicians
- Euthanasia and other end of life decisions and care provided in final three months of life: nationwide retrospective study in Belgium
- Medical murder in Belgium and the Netherlands
- First do no harm: intentionally shortening lives of patients without their explicit request in Belgium
- Terminal sedation and the “imminence condition”
- End-of-life decision-making in Belgium, Denmark, Sweden and Switzerland: does place of death make a difference?
- Internists’ attitudes towards terminal sedation in end of life care
- Response to Ronald M Perkin and David B Resnik: The agony of trying to match sanctity of life and patient-centred medical care
- The role of doctors' religious faith and ethnicity in taking ethically controversial decisions during end-of-life care
- Belgian euthanasia law: a critical analysis