Article info
PDFClinical ethics
Information disclosure and decision-making: the Middle East versus the Far East and the West
- A Mobeireek, FRCP, PO Box 3354, MBC 46, Riyadh 11211, Saudi Arabia; mobeireeK{at}yahoo.com
Citation
Information disclosure and decision-making: the Middle East versus the Far East and the West
Publication history
- Received October 24, 2006
- Revised March 1, 2007
- Accepted March 5, 2007
- First published March 28, 2008.
Online issue publication
March 28, 2008
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
2008 BMJ Publishing Group & Institute of Medical Ethics
Other content recommended for you
- The case for physician assisted suicide: not (yet) proven
- Organ donation after medical assistance in dying or cessation of life-sustaining treatment requested by conscious patients: the Canadian context
- Impact of medical assistance in dying (MAiD) on family caregivers
- Medical Assistance in Dying at a paediatric hospital
- Emotional impact on healthcare providers involved in medical assistance in dying (MAiD): a systematic review and qualitative meta-synthesis
- Becoming a medical assistance in dying (MAiD) provider: an exploration of the conditions that produce conscientious participation
- Euthanasia and other end of life decisions and care provided in final three months of life: nationwide retrospective study in Belgium
- Legal physician-assisted dying in Oregon and the Netherlands: evidence concerning the impact on patients in “vulnerable” groups
- What people close to death say about euthanasia and assisted suicide: a qualitative study
- Doctor might escape conviction on a technicality