Article info
PDFTeaching and learning ethics
Research ethics and lessons from Hwanggate: what can we learn from the Korean cloning fraud?
- Professor Julian Savulescu, Director, Oxford Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; julian.savulescu{at}philosophy.ox.ac.uk
Citation
Research ethics and lessons from Hwanggate: what can we learn from the Korean cloning fraud?
Publication history
- Received November 13, 2007
- Accepted November 13, 2007
- First published March 3, 2008.
Online issue publication
September 27, 2016
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
2008 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & the Institute of Medical Ethics
Other content recommended for you
- Is a consensus possible on stem cell research? Moral and political obstacles
- The significance of induced pluripotent stem cells for basic research and clinical therapy
- The stem cell debate continues: the buying and selling of eggs for research
- Reproductive cloning in humans and therapeutic cloning in primates: is the ethical debate catching up with the recent scientific advances?
- Embryonic stem cells: the disagreement debate and embryonic stem cell research in Israel
- What’s in a name? Embryos, entities, and ANTities in the stem cell debate
- Why the apparent haste to clone humans?
- Reproductive and therapeutic cloning, germline therapy, and purchase of gametes and embryos: comments on Canadian legislation governing reproduction technologies
- Research Ethics, Science Policy, and Four Contexts for the Stem Cell Debate
- What exactly is an exact copy? And why it matters when trying to ban human reproductive cloning in Australia