In this review of the Korean cloning scandal involving Woo-Suk Hwang, the nature of the disaster is documented and reasons why it occurred are suggested. The general problems it raises for scientific research are highlighted and six possible ways of improving practice are offered in the light of this case: (1) better education of science students; (2) independent monitoring and validation; (3) guidelines for tissue donation for research; (4) fostering of debate about ethically contentious research in science journals; (5) development of an international code of ethical research practice; (6) fostering of public involvement in ethical review and debate through the web.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Competing interests: None declared.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Is a consensus possible on stem cell research? Moral and political obstacles
- The significance of induced pluripotent stem cells for basic research and clinical therapy
- The stem cell debate continues: the buying and selling of eggs for research
- Reproductive cloning in humans and therapeutic cloning in primates: is the ethical debate catching up with the recent scientific advances?
- Embryonic stem cells: the disagreement debate and embryonic stem cell research in Israel
- What’s in a name? Embryos, entities, and ANTities in the stem cell debate
- Why the apparent haste to clone humans?
- Reproductive and therapeutic cloning, germline therapy, and purchase of gametes and embryos: comments on Canadian legislation governing reproduction technologies
- Research Ethics, Science Policy, and Four Contexts for the Stem Cell Debate
- What exactly is an exact copy? And why it matters when trying to ban human reproductive cloning in Australia