Article info
PDFLaw, ethics and medicine
Exploitation and enrichment: the paradox of medical experimentation
- M Brazier, School of law, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PL, UK; margaret.r.brazier{at}manchester.ac.uk
Citation
Exploitation and enrichment: the paradox of medical experimentation
Publication history
- Received March 14, 2007
- Revised March 14, 2007
- Accepted March 20, 2007
- First published March 3, 2008.
Online issue publication
March 03, 2008
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
2008 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & the Institute of Medical Ethics
Other content recommended for you
- What makes clinical labour different? The case of human guinea pigging
- Reification and assent in research involving those who lack capacity
- Participation in biomedical research is an imperfect moral duty: a response to John Harris
- An investigation of patients’ motivations for their participation in genetics-related research
- Systematic review and metasummary of attitudes toward research in emergency medical conditions
- Split views among parents regarding children’s right to decide about participation in research: a questionnaire survey
- Right of the living dead? Consent to experimental surgery in the event of cortical death
- Analysis of the status of informed consent in medical research involving human subjects in public hospitals in Shanghai
- A critical examination of research narratives ‘rumours’ and passive community resistance in medical research
- Role of non-government organizations in engaging medical students in research