Article Text
Clinical ethics
Medical ethics for children: applying the four principles to paediatrics
Abstract
I will argue that there are difficulties with the application of the four principles approach to incompetent children. The most important principle – respect for autonomy – is not directly applicable to incompetent children and the most appropriate modification of the principle for them is not clear. The principle of beneficence – that one should act in the child’s interests – is complicated by difficulties in assessing what a child’s interests are and to which standard of interests those choosing for children should be held. A further problem with the four principles approach is that parental authority does not follow clearly from the four principles.
- children
- ethical theory
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
Competing interests: None.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Ethics needs principles—four can encompass the rest—and respect for autonomy should be “first among equals”
- In defence of moral imperialism: four equal and universal prima facie principles
- The bioethical principles and Confucius’ moral philosophy
- Defending the four principles approach as a good basis for good medical practice and therefore for good medical ethics
- The child's right to an open future: is the principle applicable to non-therapeutic circumcision?
- Infant male circumcision and the autonomy of the child: two ethical questions
- Methods and principles in biomedical ethics
- Juggling law, ethics, and intuition: practical answers to awkward questions
- Can one do good medical ethics without principles?
- Consent for anaesthesia