Article info
PDFClinical ethics
Allowing autonomous agents freedom
- Dr Antonia J Cronin, Institute of Medicine Law and Bioethics and Institute of Science Ethics and Innovation, School of Law, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PL, UK; Antonia.Cronin{at}postgrad.manchester.ac.uk
Citation
Allowing autonomous agents freedom
Publication history
- Received October 31, 2007
- Accepted October 31, 2007
- First published March 3, 2008.
Online issue publication
April 27, 2016
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
2008 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & the Institute of Medical Ethics
Other content recommended for you
- Changes in quality of life (QoL) and other patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in living-donor and deceased-donor kidney transplant recipients and those awaiting transplantation in the UK ATTOM programme: a longitudinal cohort questionnaire survey with additional qualitative interviews
- Socioeconomic deprivation and barriers to live-donor kidney transplantation: a qualitative study of deceased-donor kidney transplant recipients
- Developing an ethics framework for living donor transplantation
- Sikh and Muslim perspectives on kidney transplantation: phase 1 of the DiGiT project – a qualitative descriptive study
- Join the Lone Kidney Club: incentivising live organ donation
- What factors explain the association between socioeconomic deprivation and reduced likelihood of live-donor kidney transplantation? A questionnaire-based pilot case-control study
- Renal transplantation
- The impact of country reimbursement programmes on living kidney donations
- Ethical analysis examining the prioritisation of living donor transplantation in times of healthcare rationing
- Underestimating the risk in living kidney donation