In psychiatry, caregivers try to get free and informed consent of patients, but often feel required to restrict freedom and to use coercion. The present article develops ethical advice given by an Ethics Committee for Mental Health Care. The advice recommends an ethical ideal of shared deliberation, consisting of information, motivation, consensus and evaluation. For the exceptional use of coercion, the advice develops three criteria, namely incapacity to deliberate, threat of serious harm and proportionality between harm and coercion.
The article also discusses the viewpoints of the ethical advice and of the European Convention on Human Rights and Biomedicine: is the advice in agreement with the Convention and can the advice refine the guidelines of the Convention for the particular context of psychiatry? Although the Convention emphasises the autonomy of the individual patient, whereas the advice focuses on the relationships between the partners involved, the advice enjoys a complementary and supportive function in the application of the Convention.
- decision making
- informed consent
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Competing interests: None.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Pressure and coercion in the care for the addicted: ethical perspectives
- Coercion and pressure in psychiatry: lessons from Ulysses
- Is supervised community treatment ethically justifiable?
- Patient-controlled hospital admission for patients with severe mental disorders: study protocol for a nationwide prospective multicentre study
- Medical management of acute severe anorexia nervosa
- The convention on human rights and biomedicine and the use of coercion in psychiatry
- “Idiots, infants, and the insane”: mental illness and legal incompetence
- Seclusion and its context in acute inpatient psychiatric care
- Good reasons to vaccinate: mandatory or payment for risk?
- Tuberculosis, non-compliance and detention for the public health