“Terminal sedation” refers to the use of sedation as palliation in dying patients with a terminal diagnosis. Although terminal sedation has received widespread legal and ethical justification, the practice remains ethically contentious, particularly as some hold that it foreseeably hastens death. It has been proposed that empirical studies show that terminal sedation does not hasten death, or that even if it may hasten death it does not do so in a foreseeable way. Nonetheless, it is clear that providing terminal sedation in combination with the withholding or withdrawing of life-prolonging treatments such as fluid and nutrition can foreseeably hasten death significantly—what is here called early terminal sedation (ETS). There are ethical justifications for the use of sedation in palliative care and thus it would seem that ETS is an ethically and legally acceptable practice. However, what emerges from the literature is the repeated assertion that terminal sedation must be restricted to use in imminently dying patients—the “imminence condition”—and that therefore ETS is unacceptable. This restriction has taken on greater significance with the trend of palliative care to include the care of patients who are not imminently dying. This paper proposes to show that although there is widespread intuitive support for the imminence condition, it does not follow from the justifications for sedation as palliation, and that explicit arguments for the imminence condition are needed.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Competing interests: None declared.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- A response to critics: weakening the ethical distinction between euthanasia, palliative opioid use and palliative sedation
- Euthanasia and palliative sedation in Belgium
- Expanded terminal sedation in end-of-life care
- Palliative sedation: not just normal medical practice. Ethical reflections on the Royal Dutch Medical Association's guideline on palliative sedation
- Weakening the ethical distinction between euthanasia, palliative opioid use and palliative sedation
- Continuous deep sedation for patients nearing death in the Netherlands: descriptive study
- Approaches to suffering at the end of life: the use of sedation in the USA and Netherlands
- Distress from voluntary refusal of food and fluids to hasten death: what is the role of continuous deep sedation?
- Ought the level of sedation to be reduced during deep palliative sedation? A clinical and ethical analysis
- Ethical end-of-life palliative care: response to Riisfeldt