Article Text
Abstract
Medical student learning is dependent on an unwritten agreement between patients and the medical profession, in which students “practise” upon real patients in order that, when they are doctors, those same patients will benefit from the doctors’ skills. Given the increasing propensity for patients to refuse to take part in such learning, there is a danger that doctors will qualify without being truly competent. As patients, we must all ask ourselves, when asked to take part in medical teaching: if this student/trainee doesn’t learn now, on me and under supervision, how will the person be truly competent next time, when this is for real, and the patient might be me or my loved one?
We argue that a new and more explicit agreement is needed, in which the default should be that all patients are willing to help in the education of medical students, while we ensure that all such students are already competent in simulation before first practising upon real patients.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Should cancer patients be informed about their diagnosis and prognosis? Future doctors and lawyers differ
- Role of active patient involvement in undergraduate medical education: a systematic review
- Dismembering the ethical physician
- Do-not-resuscitate decision: the attitudes of medical and non-medical students
- Reflecting on senior medical students' ethics reports at the University of Auckland
- Medical education challenges and innovations during COVID-19 pandemic
- Are doctors altruistic?
- Drawing the line in clinical treatment of companion animals: recommendations from an ethics working party
- How does self-perceived nutrition competence change over time during medical training? A prospective longitudinal observational study of New Zealand medical students
- Medical ethics and law for doctors of tomorrow: the 1998 Consensus Statement updated