Article Text
Abstract
Purpose: Explore public attitudes towards the trade-offs between justice and medical outcome inherent in organ allocation decisions.
Background: The US Task Force on Organ Transplantation recommended that considerations of justice, autonomy and medical outcome be part of all organ allocation decisions. Justice in this context may be modeled as a function of three types of need, related to age, clinical urgency, and quality of life.
Methods: A web-based survey was conducted in which respondents were asked to choose between two hypothetical patients who differed in clinical urgency (time to death <1 year), age, pretransplant and post-transplant quality of life, and life expectancy.
Results: A pool of 1600 people were notified via email about the survey; 623 (39%) responded. Respondents preferred giving organs to younger people up to an age difference of <15.4 years (SD 18) and more clinically urgent people up to a difference in urgency of <2.54 months (SD 3). Priority varied with the quality of life of the worst-off patient and the relative status of the patients. If both had worse than average quality of life, respondents preferred the better-off patient. When both had better than average quality of life, they preferred the worse-off patient. In analysis according to age versus clinical urgency, the older the patient, the more urgency needed to receive priority. In quality of life versus clinical urgency, the better the control’s quality of life, the more urgency the competing patient required. The worse the patient’s post-transplant outcome, the more urgency needed to receive priority.
Conclusions: It appears that clinical urgency is only one of many factors influencing attitudes about allocation decisions and that respondents may invoke different principles of fairness depending the relative clinical status of patients.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
Competing interests: None.
Request Permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information:
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Public, medical professionals ’ and patients ’ preferences for the allocation of donor organs for transplantation: study protocol for discrete choice experiments
- Join the Lone Kidney Club: incentivising live organ donation
- Access to Transplantation and Transplant Outcome Measures (ATTOM): study protocol of a UK wide, in-depth, prospective cohort analysis
- Equity in access to facial transplantation
- Statins for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease
- Balancing fairness and efficacy in lung allocation for transplantation: unfinished business
- Statins for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease
- Kidneys for transplant
- Elective non-therapeutic intensive care and the four principles of medical ethics
- Artificial neural network is superior to MELD in predicting mortality of patients with end - stage liver disease