The controversies in Bristol, Alder Hey and elsewhere in the UK surrounding the removal and retention of human tissue and organs have led to extensive law reform in all three UK legal systems. This paper reports a short study of the reactions of a range of health professionals to these changes. Three main areas of ethical concern were noted: the balancing of individual rights and social benefit; the efficacy of the new procedures for consent; and the helpfulness for professional practice of the new legislation and regulation. Recognition of these concerns may help in forging a new partnership between professionals and patients and their families.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Competing interests: None declared.
↵iA full report of this project is available from the corresponding author.
↵iiThese comments were made while the Human Tissue Bill was still being debated. In fact the Act does permit this range of activities without consent on tissue from the living, provided (in the case of research) the tissue is anonymised and the research is approved by a research ethics committee. In Scotland, the new legislation will cover only tissue from the deceased.