Article Text
Ethics
Better to exist: a reply to Benatar
Abstract
A recent exchange on Benatar’s book Better never to have been between Doyal and Benatar discusses Benatar’s bold claim that people should not be brought into existence. Here, I expand the discussion of original position that the exchange focused on. I also discuss the asymmetries, between benefit and harm and between existence and non-existence, upon which Benatar’s bold claim rests. In both discussions, I show how Benatar’s bold claim can be rejected.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Linked Articles
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Grim news for an unoriginal position: a reply to Seth Baum
- Ethics, economics, and public financing of health care
- Prioritarian principles for digital health in low resource settings
- Research for Health Justice: an ethical framework linking global health research to health equity
- Genetic information, insurance and a pluralistic approach to justice
- Overdiagnosis, ethics, and trolley problems: why factors other than outcomes matter—an essay by Stacy Carter
- Not so special after all? Daniels and the social determinants of health
- Pandemic prioritarianism
- Evaluating underpinning, complexity and implications of ethical situations in humanitarian operations: qualitative study through the lens of career humanitarian workers
- Individual autonomy and state involvement in health care