Better to exist: a reply to Benatar
A recent exchange on Benatar’s book Better never to have been between Doyal and Benatar discusses Benatar’s bold claim that people should not be brought into existence. Here, I expand the discussion of original position that the exchange focused on. I also discuss the asymmetries, between benefit and harm and between existence and non-existence, upon which Benatar’s bold claim rests. In both discussions, I show how Benatar’s bold claim can be rejected.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Grim news for an unoriginal position: a reply to Seth Baum
- Ethics, economics, and public financing of health care
- Prioritarian principles for digital health in low resource settings
- Research for Health Justice: an ethical framework linking global health research to health equity
- Genetic information, insurance and a pluralistic approach to justice
- Overdiagnosis, ethics, and trolley problems: why factors other than outcomes matter—an essay by Stacy Carter
- Not so special after all? Daniels and the social determinants of health
- Pandemic prioritarianism
- Evaluating underpinning, complexity and implications of ethical situations in humanitarian operations: qualitative study through the lens of career humanitarian workers
- Individual autonomy and state involvement in health care