Article info
PDFTeaching and learning ethics
Against moral theories: reply to Benatar
- Dr R Lawlor, Inter-disciplinary Ethics Applied, University of Leeds, 8–12 Fenton Street (Off Woodhouse Lane), Leeds LS2 9JT, UK; r.s.lawlor{at}leeds.ac.uk
Citation
Against moral theories: reply to Benatar
Publication history
- Received December 10, 2007
- Accepted January 25, 2008
- First published October 30, 2008.
Online issue publication
October 30, 2008
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
2008 BMJ Publishing Group & Institute of Medical Ethics
Other content recommended for you
- Moral theories may have some role in teaching applied ethics
- How to teach moral theories in applied ethics
- Teaching moral theories is an option: reply to Rob Lawlor
- Moral theories in teaching applied ethics
- Respect for autonomy: deciding what is good for oneself
- Moral reasoning in disaster scenarios
- The inference from a single case: moral versus scientific inferences in implementing new biotechnologies
- Avoiding evasion: medical ethics education and emotion theory
- Double effect: a useful rule that alone cannot justify hastening death
- Prescribing meaning: hedonistic perspectives on the therapeutic use of psychedelic-assisted meaning enhancement