Article info
Research ethics
Empirical developments in retraction
- Barbara K Redman, College of Nursing, Wayne State University, 5557 Cass Avenue, Detroit, Michigan 48202, USA; B.Redman{at}wayne.edu
Citation
Empirical developments in retraction
Publication history
- Received September 12, 2007
- Revised December 10, 2007
- Accepted January 9, 2008
- First published October 30, 2008.
Online issue publication
October 30, 2008
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
2008 BMJ Publishing Group & Institute of Medical Ethics
Other content recommended for you
- Scientific retractions and corrections related to misconduct findings
- Reasons for and time to retraction of genetics articles published between 1970 and 2018
- Retractions in the scientific literature: do authors deliberately commit research fraud?
- Retractions in the scientific literature: is the incidence of research fraud increasing?
- Why and how do journals retract articles? An analysis of Medline retractions 1988–2008
- Why unethical papers should be retracted
- Why articles are retracted: a retrospective cross-sectional study of retraction notices at BioMed Central
- Retractions in the medical literature: how can patients be protected from risk?
- Retracted papers originating from paper mills: cross sectional study
- Improving biomedical journals’ ethical policies: the case of research misconduct