Francis Beckwith’s Defending life: a moral and legal case against abortion choice defends the pro-life position on moral, legal and political grounds. In this critical notice I consider three key issues and argue that Beckwith’s treatment of each of them is unpersuasive. The issues are: (1) whether abortion is politically justified by the principle that we should err on the side of liberty in the face of reasonable disagreement over the moral status of the fetus; (2) whether the fetus’s natural capacity or genetic propensity to develop rationality and communication is sufficient to give it a moral right to life; and (3) whether abortion is morally justified on the basis of bodily rights. I also show that Beckwith’s book fails to consider several important issues and arguments.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Competing interests: None declared.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Abortion and Ectogenesis: Moral Compromise
- Is there a ‘new ethics of abortion’?
- Challenging the principle of proportionality
- The inconsistency argument: why apparent pro-life inconsistency undermines opposition to induced abortion
- Fetuses, newborns, & parental responsibility
- Personhood, harm and interest: a reply to Alberto Giubilini and Francesca Minerva
- Dotting the I's and crossing the T's: autonomy and/or beneficence? The ‘fetus as a patient’ in maternal–fetal surgery
- Limitations on personhood arguments for abortion and ‘after-birth abortion’
- Philosophy, critical thinking and ‘after-birth abortion: why should the baby live?’
- Yes, the baby should live: a pro-choice response to Giubilini and Minerva