Article Text
Abstract
Background: Informed consent in the modern era is a common and important topic both for the well-informed patient and to prevent unnecessary litigation. However, the effectiveness of informed consent in trauma patients is an under-researched area. This paper aims to assess the differences in patient recall of the consent process and desire for information by performing a comparative analysis between orthopaedic trauma and elective patients.
Methods: Information from 41 consecutive elective operations and 40 consecutive trauma operations was collected on the first post-operative day.
Results: 100% of elective patients and 90% of trauma patients knew what operation they had received (p = 0.06). Overall recall of complications was poor, but was significantly lower in trauma patients compared with elective patients (62% vs 22%, p<0.001). 30% of trauma patients desired more information about their operation compared to 12% of elective patients (p = 0.049), although only 35% of trauma patients wanted written as well as verbal explanations, compared to 85% of elective patients p<0.001). Overall 100% of elective and 90% of trauma patients were happy with the consent process (p = 0.06). Subset analysis of neck of femur compared to other trauma patients showed that the above factors were not significantly different between the two groups.
Conclusions: Recall of complications in the trauma patients is significantly lower than in elective patients, although both groups scored poorly overall. Repeated verbal explanations should be reinforced with the option of additional information leaflets for trauma operations. Further research into the usefulness of DVDs for commonly performed operations is warranted, although official internet resources may be more cost-effective.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
Competing interests: None declared.
Ethics approval: This audit was approved by the Audit head and registered with the Audit Department at Russells Hall Hospital, Dudley, UK.
Request Permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information:
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Is it worth screening elective orthopaedic patients for carriage of Staphylococcus aureus? A part-retrospective case – control study in a Scottish hospital
- Evaluating glial and neuronal blood biomarkers GFAP and UCH - L1 as gradients of brain injury in concussive, subconcussive and non-concussive trauma: a prospective cohort study
- Diagnostic value of post-operative platelet - to - white blood cell ratio after splenectomy in patients with advanced ovarian cancer
- Elective versus symptomatic antibiotic treatment in cystic fibrosis patients with chronic Pseudomonasinfection of the lungs
- On - scene times and critical care interventions for an aeromedical retrieval service
- ‘ Off pump ’ self-expanding injectable tissue valves (IPVR) versus ‘ on pump ’ conventional tissue valves (PVR) for replacement of the pulmonary valve: trial protocol for a randomised controlled trial (InVITe trial)
- Continuity of care for orthopaedic patients in a district general hospital
- Undertriage of the elderly major trauma patient continues in major trauma centre care: a retrospective cohort review
- Western Medical Research conference (formerly Western Regional Meeting), January 25–27 2018, Carmel, California
- Republished paper: The implications of the NICE guidelines on neurosurgical management for all severe head injuries: systematic review