Objectives: To elicit the perceptions and preferences of patients with rheumatoid arthritis regarding information and participation in treatment decision-making. To analyse the patients’ narratives on the background of the ethical discourse on various approaches to treatment decision-making.
Design: In-depth interviews with themes identified using principles of grounded theory.
Participants: 22 patients with long-standing rheumatoid arthritis.
Main outcome measures: Qualitative data on patients’ perceptions and preferences regarding information and participation in decision-making about treatment.
Results: Decision-making about treatment has been described by the patients as a process consisting of different stages with shifting loci of control and responsibility. Patients initially received one treatment recommendation and were not aware of alternative treatment options. Those participants in this study who wanted information about negative effects of a treatment cited “interest in one’s own health” and the potential “use of information” as reasons for their preference. The physicians’ expert knowledge and clinical experience regarding the effects of medication were cited as arguments by patients for a treatment recommendation.
Conclusions: The patients’ accounts of decision-making about treatment differ from models of physician–patient relationship that have been put forward in ethical discourse. These differences may be relevant with respect to the starting point of an ethical analysis of treatment decision-making. Patients’ accounts with respect to a lack of information on treatment alternatives point to ethically relevant challenges regarding treatment decision-making in clinical practice.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Competing interests: None.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Is greater patient involvement associated with higher satisfaction? Experimental evidence from a vignette survey
- Patients’ preferences for receiving clinical information and participating in decision-making in Iran
- Preference for shared decision-making among Arabic-speaking people with chronic diseases: a cross-sectional study
- Preferences of acutely ill patients for participation in medical decision-making
- Variability in patient preferences for participating in medical decision making: implication for the use of decision support tools
- Patient participation in surgical treatment decision-making can be measured using a 16-item scale with four distinct dimensions
- FRI0542 Preferences of maltese patients with rheumatic diseases for information on drug adverse events and shared decision making
- Preference phenotypes to facilitate shared decision-making in rheumatoid arthritis
- Ethical decision-making, passivity and pharmacy
- Links between evidence-based medicine and shared decision-making in courses for doctors in training: a scoping review