Article Text
Abstract
The aim of this article is to provide a preliminary ethical evaluation of the effect of telesurgery (long distance, remote surgery) on patient care. In order to accomplish this task we give a broad description of the state of the art in telesurgery and analyse it using Joan Tronto’s articulation of care as a structured process. This structure illuminates the significance of the patient-physician relationship as the buttress for establishing and preserving practices of care in the healthcare context, with the ultimate goal of safeguarding patient dignity. The process of care combined with the moral aim of medicine—to fulfil the good of the patient—provides the ethical foundation for assessing telesurgery. By exploring various telesurgical scenarios we may assess its potential role in augmenting or diminishing patient care within the frame of the patient-physician relationship. The significance of conducting this evaluation lies in the fact that the practice of telesurgery may very shortly become routine and an evaluation has not yet been attempted.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
Competing interests: None.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Robotic microsurgery: corneal transplantation
- Application and prospects of robotic surgery in children: a scoping review
- Robotic ocular surgery
- Current applications and future perspectives of robotics in cerebrovascular and endovascular neurosurgery
- Theatres without borders: a systematic review of the use of intraoperative telemedicine in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs)
- The role of robotics in colorectal surgery
- The role of technology in minimally invasive surgery: state of the art, recent developments and future directions
- Sci-fi medicine: an odyssey
- Robotic cardiac surgery: an anaesthetic challenge
- Recent advances in minimal access surgery