While some people claim that the present disagreement over embryonic stem (ES) cell research cannot be resolved, others argue that developing transparency and trust are key elements that could resolve the existing disagreements over such research. This paper reveals that transparency is not necessarily a requirement for advancing ES cell research, since in Israel, for instance, there is (almost) no transparency, and research nevertheless flourishes. Moreover, trust is not independent of cultural values and religious beliefs. Because of these beliefs, the environment in Israel for ES cell research has been pragmatic and liberal. The Israeli case illustrates the key role that culture and religion can play in biomedical research; it also suggests that as far as cultural values or religious beliefs of people in Western countries strongly oppose research on embryonic tissue, it would be very difficult, if not impossible, to overcome the disagreements.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Competing interests: None.
↵i Stem cell publishing data compiled by the Bibliometric Analysis Unit of the Central Library, Jülich Research Center, by reviewing titles, abstracts and keywords of more than 6 000 natural science journals tracked by the Science Citation Index of Thomson Scientific.1
↵ii For instance, the “father” of IVF in Israel has recurred to the antiabortionist rhetoric of “any unborn baby is a murdered child”, meaning that fewer cycles of IVF do signify fewer children born. Also, because of the deeply embedded memories of the Holocaust, such rhetoric has proved very effective; the two-IVF-children scheme was not revoked.
↵iii This resulted in a new scandal. An Israeli physician set a global network of fertility clinics (Global ART) to export and import ova. Under this scheme, eggs harvested from women in Romania are sold to American and Israeli women. The Romanian women are paid some modest amount of money for their eggs. Two Romanian women who sold their eggs under this scheme appealed to the European Court of Human Rights because when complications arose the clinic just ignored them.11
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- What’s in a name? Embryos, entities, and ANTities in the stem cell debate
- Creating and sacrificing embryos for stem cells
- Research Ethics, Science Policy, and Four Contexts for the Stem Cell Debate
- Embryo as epiphenomenon: some cultural, social and economic forces driving the stem cell debate
- Reproductive and therapeutic cloning, germline therapy, and purchase of gametes and embryos: comments on Canadian legislation governing reproduction technologies
- Is a consensus possible on stem cell research? Moral and political obstacles
- How reproductive and regenerative medicine meet in a Chinese fertility clinic. Interviews with women about the donation of embryos to stem cell research
- The significance of induced pluripotent stem cells for basic research and clinical therapy
- Embryo deaths in reproduction and embryo research: a reply to Murphy's double effect argument
- Human embryonic stem cells and respect for life