Article info
PDFEthics
A critique of “the best secular argument against abortion”
- Professor C Strong, Department of Human Values and Ethics, College of Medicine, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, 910 Madison Avenue, Suite 311-313, Memphis, Tennessee 38163, USA; cstrong{at}utmem.edu
Citation
A critique of “the best secular argument against abortion”
Publication history
- Received February 1, 2008
- Revised March 11, 2008
- Accepted March 18, 2008
- First published September 30, 2008.
Online issue publication
April 27, 2016
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
2008 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and the Institute of Medical Ethics
Other content recommended for you
- Reply to Marquis: how things stand with the ‘future like ours’ argument
- Reply to Di Nucci: why the counterexamples succeed
- Abortion: Strong’s counterexamples fail
- Strong's objections to the future of value account
- Savulescu’s objections to the future of value argument
- Abortion and human nature
- Deprivations, futures and the wrongness of killing
- The morality of abortion and the deprivation of futures
- On how to interpret the role of the future within the abortion debate
- A future like ours revisited