Face transplantation—or, more properly, facial allograft transplantation (FAT)—generates much public interest and academic debate. In this paper, we suggest that it is up to opponents of FAT to make the case for its impermissibility. We allow that there is a number of apparently strong arguments that might be deployed against FAT. However, all but one of these turn out not to be compelling after examination. The remaining argument is not so easily dismissed—but its central point is fairly workaday and certainly does not tell us anything about FAT in particular. Therefore, qua argument about facial transplant surgery, it fails to hit its target. Overall, we conclude that a compelling case against FAT remains to be made.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Competing interests: None.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Facial allograft transplantation, personal identity and subjectivity
- Until they have faces: the ethics of facial allograft transplantation
- Justifying surgery’s last taboo: the ethics of face transplants
- ‘That is the skin of my brother’: alterity, hybridity and media representations of facial transplantation
- Equity in access to facial transplantation
- From Face/Off to the face race: the case of Isabelle Dinoire and the future of the face transplant
- (When) will they have faces? A response to Agich and Siemionov
- ‘A Procedure Without a Problem’, or the face transplant that didn’t happen. The Royal Free, the Royal College of Surgeons and the challenge of surgical firsts
- Vascularised composite allotransplantation: implications for the Defence Medical Services
- Face transplantation for the blind: more than being blind in a sighted world