Due to the worldwide shortage of organs for transplantation, there has been an increased use of organs obtained after circulatory death alone. A protocol for this procedure has recently been approved by a major transplant consortium. This development raises serious moral and ethical concerns. Two renowned theologians of the previous generation, Paul Ramsey and Moshe Feinstein, wrote extensively on the ethical issues relating to transplantation, and their work has much relevance to current moral dilemmas. Their writings relating to definition of death, organ transplantation and the care of the terminally ill are briefly presented, and their potential application to the moral problem of organ donation after circulatory death is discussed.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Competing interests: None.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- The dead donor rule: effect on the virtuous practice of medicine
- Neonatal organ donation: has the time come?
- Critical care in the Emergency Department: organ donation
- Death, dying and donation: organ transplantation and the diagnosis of death
- Individual choice in the definition of death
- Outcomes of transplantation of livers from donation after circulatory death donors in the UK: a cohort study
- Is heart transplantation after circulatory death compatible with the dead donor rule?
- Exploring the use of high and low demand simulation for human performance assessment during multiorgan retrieval with the joint scrub practitioner
- Defining death in non-heart beating organ donors
- Protocol of a randomised controlled, open-label trial of ex vivo normothermic perfusion versus static cold storage in donation after circulatory death renal transplantation