This paper highlights a feature common to many ethical guidelines—namely, the idea that the interests of the individual shall always prevail over the interests of science and society. The paper presents how some major ethical guidelines treat the balancing of research interests against those of research subjects and spells out the difficulties in interpreting the principle of the primacy of the individual in a way that can be action-guiding. It suggests various alternative interpretations of the primacy of the individual and argues that they do not hold. Finally, the implications of this analysis for ethical guidelines are discussed.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Both authors are researchers at the Centre for Bioethics at Karolinska Institutet and Uppsala University.
Funding: Financial support for this work from the Bank of Sweden Tercentenary Foundation is gratefully acknowledged.
Competing interests: None.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- The moral primacy of the human being
- The moral primacy of the human being: a reply to Parker
- The 2008 Declaration of Helsinki: some reflections
- Scientific research is a moral duty
- Ethical concerns regarding guidelines for the conduct of clinical research on children
- Global bioethics at UNESCO: in defence of the Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights
- Whose dignity? Resolving ambiguities in the scope of “human dignity” in the Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights
- Human rights-based approach to tobacco control
- Ethics in a scientific approach: the importance of the biostatistician in research ethics committees
- Broadening consent—and diluting ethics?