Current UK legislation is impacting upon the feasibility and cost-effectiveness of medical record-based research aimed at benefiting the NHS and the public heath. Whereas previous commentators have focused on the Data Protection Act 1998, the Health and Social Care Act 2001 is the key legislation for public health researchers wishing to access medical records without written consent. The Act requires researchers to apply to the Patient Information Advisory Group (PIAG) for permission to access medical records without written permission. We present a case study of the work required to obtain the necessary permissions from PIAG in order to conduct a large scale public health research project. In our experience it took eight months to receive permission to access basic identifying information on individuals registered at general practices, and a decision on whether we could access clinical information in medical records without consent took 18 months. Such delays pose near insurmountable difficulties to grant funded research, and in our case £560 000 of public and charitable money was spent on research staff while a large part of their work was prohibited until the third year of a three year grant. We conclude by arguing that many of the current problems could be avoided by returning PIAG’s responsibilities to research ethics committees, and by allowing “opt-out” consent for many public health research projects.
- informed consent
- research ethics
- UK Health and Social Care Act 2001
- medical records based research
- Patient Information Advisory Group (PIAG)
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Trial registration: The CAP Study was registered on the 29th November 2004 at http://www.controlled-trials.com/isrctn. Registration number: ISRCTN92187251.
Funding: The CAP study is funded by Cancer Research UK and the UK Department of Health. The views and opinions expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of Cancer Research UK or the Department of Health.
Competing interests: None.
Ethics approval: The CAP Study has been approved by the Trent Multi-centre Research Ethics Committee (MREC). Reference numbers are MREC/03/4/093 (12th February 2004) and 05/MRE04/78 (24th November 2005).
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- National survey of British public's views on use of identifiable medical data by the National Cancer Registry
- The social licence for research: why care.data ran into trouble
- Extracting information from hospital records: what patients think about consent
- Legal aspects of records based medical research
- Confidentiality and the duties of care
- Data protection, informed consent, and research
- Legal and ethical considerations in processing patient-identifiable data without patient consent: lessons learnt from developing a disease register
- Ethical approval for research involving geographically dispersed subjects: unsuitability of the UK MREC/LREC system and relevance to uncommon genetic disorders
- Non-commercial clinical trials of a medicinal product: can they survive the current process of research approvals in the UK?
- Preparing raw clinical data for publication: guidance for journal editors, authors, and peer reviewers