Article info
Ethics
The expressivist objection to prenatal diagnosis: can it be laid to rest?
- Professor Søren Holm, Cardiff Law School, Museum Avenue, Cardiff CF10 3AX, UK; holms{at}cardiff.ac.uk
Citation
The expressivist objection to prenatal diagnosis: can it be laid to rest?
Publication history
- Received May 24, 2007
- Accepted May 24, 2007
- First published December 21, 2007.
Online issue publication
December 21, 2007
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
2008 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and Institute of Medical Ethics
Other content recommended for you
- Hostile environments? Down’s syndrome and genetic screening in contemporary culture
- Expressivism at the beginning and end of life
- Prenatal diagnosis and selective abortion: a result of the cultural turn?
- Disability, identity and the “expressivist objection”
- Sickle cell disease and thalassaemia antenatal screening programme in England over 10 years: a review from 2007/2008 to 2016/2017
- When choosing the traits of children is hurtful to others
- Is there an ethical difference between preimplantation genetic diagnosis and abortion?
- Would you terminate a pregnancy affected by sickle cell disease? Analysis of views of patients in Cameroon
- Ethics of routine: a critical analysis of the concept of ‘routinisation’ in prenatal screening
- Deciding against disability: does the use of reproductive genetic technologies express disvalue for people with disabilities?