Article info
PDFResearch ethics
Embryos and pseudoembryos: parthenotes, reprogrammed oocytes and headless clones
- Correspondence to: Dr H Watt Linacre Centre for Healthcare Ethics, 38 Circus Road, London NW8 9SE, UK; h.watt{at}linacre.org
Citation
Embryos and pseudoembryos: parthenotes, reprogrammed oocytes and headless clones
Publication history
- Received May 16, 2006
- Accepted August 29, 2006
- Revised August 23, 2006
- First published August 30, 2007.
Online issue publication
April 27, 2016
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Copyright 2007 by the Journal of Medical Ethics
Other content recommended for you
- A natural stem cell therapy? How novel findings and biotechnology clarify the ethics of stem cell research
- Stem cells, embryos, and the environment: a context for both science and ethics
- What’s in a name? Embryos, entities, and ANTities in the stem cell debate
- Potentiality of embryonic stem cells: an ethical problem even with alternative stem cell sources
- The moral value of induced pluripotent stem cells: a Japanese bioethics perspective on human embryo research
- Human embryonic stem cell research debates: a Confucian argument
- Is a consensus possible on stem cell research? Moral and political obstacles
- Regenerative medicine: stem cells and the science of monstrosity
- Human embryonic stem cells and respect for life
- Why the apparent haste to clone humans?