Background: The offer of aggregate study results to research participants following study completion is increasingly accepted as a means of demonstrating greater respect for participants. The attitudes of research ethics board (REB) chairs towards this practice, although integral to policy development, are unknown.
Objectives: To determine the attitudes of REB chairs and the practices of REBs with respect to disclosure of results to research participants.
Design: A postal questionnaire was distributed to the chairs of English-language university-based REBs in Canada. In total, 88 REB chairs were eligible. The questionnaire examined respondents’ attitudes towards offering participants completed study results, methods for delivering this information, and barriers to disclosing results.
Findings: The response rate was 89.8%. Chairs were highly supportive (94.8%) of offering results to research participants. Only 19.5% of chairs responded that a policy or guideline that governed the return of research results to participants existed at their institution. Most chairs (72.0%) supported the idea of their REB instituting a set of guidelines recommending that researchers offer results to participants in a lay format. Chairs identified the major impediments to the implementation of programmes offering to return results to participants as being financial cost (57.5%) and retaining contact with research participants (78.1%).
Conclusions: University-based REB chairs overwhelmingly support the offer of research results to participants. This is incongruent with the frequent lack of existing REB guidelines recommending this practice. REBs should support guidelines that diminish identified barriers and promote consistency in offering to return results.
- IRB, institutional research board
- REB, research ethics board
- ethics committees
- research subjects
- research ethics
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
This research was supported by a grant from the Dalhousie Medical Research Foundation, (Dalhousie Medical School, Halifax, Canada) and by an IWK Category A Grant (IWK Health Centre, Halifax, Canada). The researchers are free to publish their research findings.
Competing interests: None declared.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Informing research participants of research results: analysis of Canadian university based research ethics board policies
- Attitudes of African-American parents about biobank participation and return of results for themselves and their children
- Reconsenting paediatric research participants for use of identifying data
- Health outcomes, utility and costs of returning incidental results from genomic sequencing in a Canadian cancer population: protocol for a mixed-methods randomised controlled trial
- The return of individual research findings in paediatric genetic research
- Sickle Cell Disease Genomics of Africa (SickleGenAfrica) Network: ethical framework and initial qualitative findings from community engagement in Ghana, Nigeria and Tanzania
- Ethics of ‘Counting Me In’: framing the implications of direct-to-patient genomics research
- Genetics Adviser: a protocol for a mixed-methods randomised controlled trial evaluating a digital platform for genetics service delivery
- Duty to disclose what? Querying the putative obligation to return research results to participants
- Navigating the ethical maze of genomics in Canada’s military