Article info
PDFLaw, ethics and medicine
The baby MB case: medical decision making in the context of uncertain infant suffering
- Correspondence to: Monique Jonas Centre for Professional Ethics, Keele Hall, Keele University, Staffordshire ST5 5BG, UK; m.jonas{at}peak.keele.ac.uk
Citation
The baby MB case: medical decision making in the context of uncertain infant suffering
Publication history
- Received May 9, 2006
- Accepted October 23, 2006
- Revised October 20, 2006
- First published August 30, 2007.
Online issue publication
August 30, 2007
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Copyright 2007 by the Journal of Medical Ethics
Other content recommended for you
- Infanticide and moral consistency
- Genetic enhancement, post-persons and moral status: a reply to Buchanan
- Why is it possible to enhance moral status and why doing so is wrong?
- The biomedical enhancement of moral status
- Clinicians’ criteria for fetal moral status: viability and relationality, not sentience
- Limitations on personhood arguments for abortion and ‘after-birth abortion’
- The moral status of post-persons
- Clarifying best interests
- Computer mouse use predicts acute pain but not prolonged or chronic pain in the neck and shoulder
- Efficacy and safety of non-pharmacological interventions for neonatal pain: an overview of systematic reviews