Article info
PDFResearch ethics
Refuting the net risks test: a response to Wendler and Miller’s “Assessing research risks systematically”
- Correspondence to: Charles Weijer Department of Philosophy, Talbot College, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada, N6A 3K7; charles.weijer{at}dal.ca
Citation
Refuting the net risks test: a response to Wendler and Miller’s “Assessing research risks systematically”
Publication history
- Received July 18, 2006
- Accepted October 6, 2006
- Revised October 3, 2006
- First published July 30, 2007.
Online issue publication
April 27, 2016
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Copyright 2007 by the Journal of Medical Ethics
Other content recommended for you
- Assessing research risks systematically: the net risks test
- Trust based obligations of the state and physician-researchers to patient-subjects
- Limits to research risks
- Process of risk assessment by research ethics committees: foundations, shortcomings and open questions
- Equipoise, standard of care and consent: responding to the authorisation of new COVID-19 treatments in randomised controlled trials
- Developing capacity to protect human research subjects in a post-conflict, resource-constrained setting: procedures and prospects
- Distinguishing treatment from research: a functional approach
- Health policy and systems research: towards a better understanding and review of ethical issues
- Intervening in clinical research to prevent the onset of psychoses: conflicts and obligations
- Individual risk and community benefit in international research