Article info
PDFClinical ethics
Routine antenatal HIV testing and informed consent: an unworkable marriage?
- Correspondence to: Dr Rebecca Bennett Senior Lecturer in Bioethics, The Centre for Social Ethics and Policy, School of Law, University of Manchester, Manchester, M16 8DX, United Kingdom; Rebecca.Bennett{at}manchester.ac.uk
Citation
Routine antenatal HIV testing and informed consent: an unworkable marriage?
Publication history
- Received October 20, 2006
- Accepted October 27, 2006
- First published July 30, 2007.
Online issue publication
July 30, 2007
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Copyright 2007 by the Journal of Medical Ethics
Other content recommended for you
- Routine antenatal HIV testing: the responses and perceptions of pregnant women and the viability of informed consent. A qualitative study
- The place of routine HIV testing
- A comparison of effectiveness between oral rapid testing and routine serum-based testing for HIV in an outpatient dental clinic in Yuxi Prefecture, China: a case–control study
- Should pregnant women with unknown HIV status be offered rapid HIV testing in labour?
- General practitioners' attitudes and beliefs on antenatal testing for HIV: postal questionnaire survey
- Routine HIV and sexually transmitted infection testing in an abortion service: 6 years’ experience
- Acceptability and feasibility of dual HIV and syphilis point-of-care testing for early detection of infection among pregnant women in China: a prospective study
- HIV testing in termination of pregnancy and colposcopy services: a scoping review
- Advances in the prevention and treatment of paediatric HIV infection in the United Kingdom
- Offering routine antenatal testing for HIV and hepatitis B in the rural setting of Cornwall