Participation in biomedical research is an imperfect moral duty: a response to John Harris
Share this article
Click the icon of the social media platform on which you would like to share this article.
Email this article to a friend
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Other content recommended for you
- Scientific research is a moral duty
- The 2008 Declaration of Helsinki: some reflections
- Appropriateness of no-fault compensation for research-related injuries from an African perspective: an appeal for action by African countries
- Reification and assent in research involving those who lack capacity
- Ethics committees for biomedical research in some African emerging countries: which establishment for which independence? A comparison with the USA and Canada
- First among equals? Adaptive preferences and the limits of autonomy in medical ethics
- Children’s understanding of the risks and benefits associated with research
- Defending the four principles approach as a good basis for good medical practice and therefore for good medical ethics
- Good and not so good medical ethics
- Dotting the I's and crossing the T's: autonomy and/or beneficence? The ‘fetus as a patient’ in maternal–fetal surgery