Article info
PDFResearch ethics
Participation in biomedical research is an imperfect moral duty: a response to John Harris
- Correspondence to: Dr S Shapshay Department of Philosophy, Indiana University, 1033 E Third Street, Bloomington, IN 47405, USA; sshapsha{at}indiana.edu
Citation
Participation in biomedical research is an imperfect moral duty: a response to John Harris
Publication history
- Received May 24, 2006
- Accepted June 29, 2006
- Revised June 28, 2006
- First published June 29, 2007.
Online issue publication
June 29, 2007
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Copyright 2007 by the Journal of Medical Ethics
Other content recommended for you
- Scientific research is a moral duty
- The 2008 Declaration of Helsinki: some reflections
- Genetic research and the collective good: participants as leaders to reconcile individual and public interests
- Appropriateness of no-fault compensation for research-related injuries from an African perspective: an appeal for action by African countries
- Reification and assent in research involving those who lack capacity
- Ethics committees for biomedical research in some African emerging countries: which establishment for which independence? A comparison with the USA and Canada
- First among equals? Adaptive preferences and the limits of autonomy in medical ethics
- Children’s understanding of the risks and benefits associated with research
- Defending the four principles approach as a good basis for good medical practice and therefore for good medical ethics
- Good and not so good medical ethics