Article info
PDFGlobal medical ethics
Can evidence-based medicine implicitly rely on current concepts of disease or does it have to develop its own definition?
- Correspondence to: Dr A Gerber Institute of Health Economics and Clinical Epidemiology, University of Cologne, Gleueler Strasse 176–178, 50935 Cologne/Koeln, Germany; gerber{at}igke.de
Citation
Can evidence-based medicine implicitly rely on current concepts of disease or does it have to develop its own definition?
Publication history
- Received June 14, 2006
- Accepted July 20, 2006
- First published June 29, 2007.
Online issue publication
April 27, 2016
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Copyright 2007 by the Journal of Medical Ethics
Other content recommended for you
- The technological invention of disease
- ‘Rethinking “Disease”: a fresh diagnosis and a new philosophical treatment’
- Chronic fatigue syndrome and an illness-focused approach to care: controversy, morality and paradox
- ‘What is (mental) disease?’: an open letter to Christopher Boorse
- Do diseases really exist?
- What are the key contextual factors when preparing for successful implementation of assistive living technology in primary elderly care? A case study from Norway
- Public, health professional and legislator perspectives on the concept of psychiatric disease: a population-based survey
- Elements of integrated care approaches for older people: a review of reviews
- Methodological insights: fuzzy sets in medicine
- Scoping review exploring the impact of digital systems on processes and outcomes in the care management of acute kidney injury and progress towards establishing learning healthcare systems