Article Text
Global medical ethics
Can evidence-based medicine implicitly rely on current concepts of disease or does it have to develop its own definition?
Abstract
Decisions in healthcare are made against the background of cultural and philosophical definitions of disease, sickness and illness. These concepts or definitions affect both health policy (macro level) and research (meso level), as well as individual encounters between patients and physicians (micro level). It is therefore necessary for evidence-based medicine to consider whether any of the definitions underlying research prior to the hierarchisation of knowledge are indeed compatible with its own epistemological principles.
- EbM, evidence-based medicine
- RCT, randomised clinical trial
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- The technological invention of disease
- ‘Rethinking “Disease”: a fresh diagnosis and a new philosophical treatment’
- Chronic fatigue syndrome and an illness-focused approach to care: controversy, morality and paradox
- ‘What is (mental) disease?’: an open letter to Christopher Boorse
- Do diseases really exist?
- What are the key contextual factors when preparing for successful implementation of assistive living technology in primary elderly care? A case study from Norway
- Public, health professional and legislator perspectives on the concept of psychiatric disease: a population-based survey
- Elements of integrated care approaches for older people: a review of reviews
- Methodological insights: fuzzy sets in medicine
- Scoping review exploring the impact of digital systems on processes and outcomes in the care management of acute kidney injury and progress towards establishing learning healthcare systems