Article Text
PDF
Statistics from Altmetric.com
In the response by Ives (J Med Ethics 2007;33:119–22), there are several typographical errors. There are listed below.
Abstract: The second sentence should read “In this response, I take up the challenge they issue and try to reconcile this conflict.”
Footnote i: Should read, “See Brecher’s, Why the kantian ideal survives medical learning curves, and why it matters, for a discussion of this issue.1a”.
Page 120, column 2: the second ‘a’ should read “b”.
Page 121, column 1, line 28: remove reference “6”.
Page 121, column 1, line 39: ‘does’ should read “do”.
Request Permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information:
Linked Articles
- Teaching and learning ethics
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Kant, curves and medical learning practice: a reply to Le Morvan and Stock
- Medical learning curves and the Kantian ideal
- Why the Kantian ideal survives medical learning curves, and why it matters
- Quality of Cochrane reviews: assessment of sample from 1998
- 2nd International Conference on Biomedicine and Pharmaceutics (ICBP) 2014
- Practical virtue ethics: healthcare whistleblowing and portable digital technology
- One-step extrapolation of the prediction performance of a gene signature derived from a small study
- Protocol for a three-phase prospective study to develop educational resource of antimicrobial resistance and stewardship for medical programme
- Training and simulation for patient safety
- SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials