Article info
Research ethics
Scientific misconduct from the perspective of research coordinators: a national survey
- Correspondence to: Dr E R Pryor School of Nursing, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 1530, 3rd Avenue South, NB 235, Birmingham, AL 35294-1210, USA; erpphd{at}uab.edu
Citation
Scientific misconduct from the perspective of research coordinators: a national survey
Publication history
- Received February 21, 2006
- Accepted June 28, 2006
- Revised June 21, 2006
- First published May 25, 2007.
Online issue publication
May 25, 2007
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Copyright 2007 by the Journal of Medical Ethics
Other content recommended for you
- Scientific dishonesty—questionnaire to doctoral students in Sweden
- Managing research misconduct: is anyone getting it right?
- Retractions in the medical literature: how can patients be protected from risk?
- Whistleblowing in academic medicine
- Reasons for and time to retraction of genetics articles published between 1970 and 2018
- Identifying bioethical issues in biostatistical consulting: findings from a US national pilot survey of biostatisticians
- Scientific retractions and corrections related to misconduct findings
- The White Bull effect: abusive coauthorship and publication parasitism
- Dealing with scientific misconduct
- Scientists call for whistleblowers' charter