Global medical ethics
Male circumcision and HIV prevention: ethical, medical and public health tradeoffs in low-income countries
Other content recommended for you
- Veracity and rhetoric in paediatric medicine: a critique of Svoboda and Van Howe's response to the AAP policy on infant male circumcision
- A covenant with the status quo? Male circumcision and the new BMA guidance to doctors
- Circumcision: Divided we fall
- The child's interests and the case for the permissibility of male infant circumcision
- Male circumcision: an acceptable strategy for HIV prevention in Botswana
- Circumcision among men who have sex with men in Scotland: limited potential for HIV prevention
- ‘The body we leave behind’: a qualitative study of obstacles and opportunities for increasing uptake of male circumcision among Tanzanian Christians
- Social complexities of informed consent and assent among young males undergoing voluntary medical male circumcision in Eswatini
- Male circumcision and risk of syphilis, chancroid, and genital herpes: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- Routine male neonatal circumcision and risk of infection with HIV-1 and other sexually transmitted diseases
Jump to comment:
The analysis of the role of circumcision as a preventive for HIV infection provided by Rennie et al. is driven by the social norm to circumcise  and shows a failure to appreciate the place of circumcision within the context of other HIV preventives, the ethics of recommending a health care intervention, the applicability of proxy-consent, and everyone's right to autonomy and security of person. In addition, the analysis is...
Rennie, Muula and Westreich are right to draw attention to ethical questions surrounding circumcision. This is particularly important, especially now, when circumcision is being promoted as a way of reducing the chances of contracting HIV. I want to draw attention to something that is clearly unethical: forced circumcision.
When Muslim extremists forcibly circumcised Christian men, women and...
The article by Stuart Rennie, Adamson Muula and Daniel Westreich [JME, 33:357], which focuses on the promotion of male circumcision for public health purposes, raises many practical issues, economic issues and ethical issues. The ethics of male circumcision have been already widely discussed, especially from a physician perspective . Here we focus on the arguments developed by Rennie and colleagues...