This qualitative cross-sectional survey, undertaken in the antenatal booking clinics of a hospital in central London, explores pregnant women’s responses to routine HIV testing, examines their reasons for declining or accepting the test, and assesses how far their responses fulfil standard criteria for informed consent. Of the 32 women interviewed, only 10 participants were prepared for HIV testing at their booking interview. None of the women viewed themselves as being particularly at risk for HIV infection. The minority (n = 6) of the participants who declined testing differed from those who accepted, by interpreting test acceptance as risky behaviour, privileging the negative outcomes of HIV positivity and expressing an inability to cope with these, should they occur. Troublingly, only a minority of women (n = 9) had a broad understanding of the rationale for the test, and none fulfilled the standard criteria for informed consent. This study suggests that, although routine screening combined with professional recommendation may be successful in increasing uptake, this may be at the cost of eroding informed consent. Protecting third parties (notably fetuses) from a preventable disease may outweigh the moral duty of respecting autonomy, enshrined in Western bioethical tradition. Nevertheless, such a policy should be made transparent, debated in the public domain and negotiated with women seeking antenatal care.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Funding: WeLReN provided funding for the study.
Competing interests: None.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Routine antenatal HIV testing and informed consent: an unworkable marriage? i
- Health and medical professionals’ antenatal HIV testing practices and perceived barriers to routine testing in Tasmania, Australia: a qualitative study
- A comparison of effectiveness between oral rapid testing and routine serum-based testing for HIV in an outpatient dental clinic in Yuxi Prefecture, China: a case–control study
- General practitioners' attitudes and beliefs on antenatal testing for HIV: postal questionnaire survey
- The place of routine HIV testing
- Should pregnant women with unknown HIV status be offered rapid HIV testing in labour?
- Exploring staff attitudes to routine HIV testing in non-traditional settings: a qualitative study in four healthcare facilities
- HIV testing in termination of pregnancy and colposcopy services: a scoping review
- Uptake and acceptability of antenatal HIV testing: randomised controlled trial of different methods of offering the test
- Advances in the prevention and treatment of paediatric HIV infection in the United Kingdom